To Infinitives And Beyond – The One Thing Grammar Nazis Might Consider Leaving Alone
There’s nothing really wrong with grammar nazis’ intentions. The constant tug of war between the people who want to throw out the rules and the ones who take them far too seriously is good for the English language. It keeps it healthy. Plus everyone enjoys watching a good old chatroom fight on the internet.
Personally, I don’t fall into either camp. The grammatical rules of English are labyrinthine and I don’t pretend to know even a significant fraction of them. The ones I do know, I often break deliberately for effect. I’m also prone to using the Oxford Comma. One thing I do know though is this. Correct grammar is not necessarily synonymous with good writing.
Take the following sentence : “The the the the the the”. Technically, it is grammatically correct. It’s fucking nonsense though. In fact, if you look back at the history of grammar, quite a lot of it is fucking nonsense. And the biggest nonsense of all is the objection to split infinitives.
When the rules of English grammar were formulated, they were formulated by classical scholars. These men, being classical scholars, adored Latin. They thought Latin was beautiful, perfect language rather than the clunky awkward monstrosity that it actually is. It’s a dead language for a reason, and even most Romans usually talked Greek to each other because they were Italian at the end of day and it’s difficult to have a heated argument when you’re wrestling with Case and Declensions.
But Dr Johnson et al decided that, as infinitives are not split in Latin, then they should never be split in English either. Which is all fine and dandy until you consider that the infinitive the Grammar Nazis, past and present, don’t want us to split is the Present Active. To Do, To Love, To Go and suchlike. And in Latin, these are all single words. Laudare- To Praise, Amare- To Love etc. So the reason they are never split is because, being single words, you can’t split them. Not in the same way at any rate.
In other words, the “don’t split infinitives” rule is a result of 17th Century intellectual snobbery. It also conveniently ignores the fact that it was perfectly acceptable in classical Latin poetry to use tmesis to split infinitives in order to suggest a visual image. Ovid’s “Metamorphoses” splits the word “Circumdare” – To Surround, so that it becomes “Circum virum dant” –they surround the man. The man being in the middle and surrounded by the split infinitive. No, I don’t really get the point of it either.
One point I do get though, is that the original purpose of English grammar was not to allow people to bludgeon other people into submission online with knowledge that they very often only acquired the previous day. The original purpose of English grammar was to establish clarity in a language that, despite its beauty and expressive ability, is essentially just a mish mash of lots of other languages.
Take what is probably the most famous split infinitive of all time. “To boldly go where no man has gone before”. Firstly, if you can’t figure out that “to boldly go” means the same as “to go boldly”, then you are a fucking moron. Secondly, “to boldly go” just sounds better. “to go boldly” kind of dissipates and sounds like a euphemism for a tactical retreat. “To boldly go” sounds like you’re off to kick someone’s head in that really deserves it.
Surely even the most heartless grammar nazi wouldn’t rob the Star Trek fans of the immortal words of James T Kirk? Or the later, more wishy washy and politically correct version from the lips of Jean Luc Picard? Mind you, Picard was supposed to be French, and French infinitives are all single words too. Which is probably why Gene Roddenberry picked the most British actor he could find to play him. One who’d done a great deal of Shakespeare. A playwright from a time when people cared more about a good story than about rules.
© Copyright Michael Grimes 2013
Tags: chatrooms, Dr Johnson, English, gene roddenberry, grammar, grammar nazis, infinitives, jean luc picard, Latin, metamorphoses, nonsense, ovid, oxford comma, scholars, Shakespeare, Spock, star trek
About thedailygrime
At that awkward age - too young to be a grumpy old man, but just acerbic and downtrodden enough to have an opinion. Read it here.All I’ve got is this pen
Most recent rants from the Frank Zappa of writing
- The Year Without A Summer – The Two Ronnies, Frankenstein And The Sickliness Of Strawberry Bonbons
- Steps – Medicine, Marketing And The Myth Of Fitness
- Mother’s Ruin – Brexit, Gin and Boris Johnson
- Dancin’ Feet – Paul McCartney, Apple Records And The End Of My Musical Career
- Spoofer McGrimes – How A Childhood Of Lying Has Led Me To Want To Be A Writer When I Grow Up
Browse the Archives
- April 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (3)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (5)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (4)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (2)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (2)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (7)
- September 2015 (7)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (20)
- June 2015 (10)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (6)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (6)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (10)
- April 2014 (12)
- March 2014 (14)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (20)
- December 2013 (10)
- November 2013 (7)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (12)
- March 2013 (7)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (1)
- October 2011 (1)